Aug 312012
 

The two tried and tested methods for the engine removal are either lifting it out from above or lowering it onto a trolley and then lifting the body sufficiently until the engine is clear of the sub frames. Although I’ve heard of people, doing full restorations, who have lowered the engine onto a trolley and then removed the surrounding engine sub frames.

The difficulty with the removal from above is that the engine and gearbox come out together as a single unit and this requires it to be tilted at the same time as it is being lifted clear. I didn’t have a controllable method of tilting and wasn’t too keen on having such a weighty item dangling at such a height.

All the ancillaries had been removed and the lifting frame ready to drop the engine. The off-side front suspension still refused to come off!I was also doubtful that my home-made lifting frame, scaffolding cut to make a cross beam supported by A-frames, could raise the engine/gearbox unit to a sufficient height to clear the sub frames. So my only real option was to drop the engine.

The bottom out approach is documented in the Haynes manual and required the removal of all the engine ancillaries, the exhaust and inlet manifolds, alternator, oil filter etc. Once these had been removed I was then ready to lower the engine. Gulp! So far, so good.

At this point I must have taken leave of my senses when making some key decisions and the removal process descended into more of a farce!

I had some 1″ square Dexion speedframe lying around which included a set of castor wheels so I set about making a makeshift trolley. I’d lower the engine and gearbox on to the trolley, lift the car and then pull clear.

The first issues were the length of the 3-pronged corner connectors and that a length of 1″ square would be required between the connector and the castors. This resulted in a considerably higher platform that I’d originally envisaged.

The knock on effect was that, not only would I have to raise the front of the car even further, I would have to raise the rear of the car to reduce the body angle when the front was raised. This would allow the engine & gearbox to be dropped without hitting the sub frames. At this stage I should have reconsidered my approach to how I was dropping the engine.

The car was already supported on axle stands so once the ancillaries had been removed, the hoist could be used to lower the engine onto the waiting trolley. The castors were already showing signs of giving way, as can be seen in the photo above! I really should have reconsidered whether it was wise to continue. However, again, I ploughed on. Dooh!

The ridiculous height of the makeshift trolley caused no end of trouble! Not only that but it shows the first signs of the castors giving way under the weightThe front and rear were then raised alternately, supported by axle stands on building blocks. The rear was just about within the range of my trolley jacks but the front needed to be lifted via the lifting frame.

Once the front sub-frame was clear of the engine, the lifting frame was used to take the full weight of the front of the bodyshell. The supporting blocks were then removed to provide an exit route for my wobbly trolley. The trolley castors didn’t approve of being moved and their jaunty angle worsened severely as the trolley was delicately pulled clear!

At this stage I would have been in all sorts of problems had the trolley collapsed “mid-extraction” as the only lifting gear I had was in used supporting the bodyshell!

I did have to realign the trolley legs several times, taking the weight by an extended crowbar. It was very close but fortunately the trolley lasted just long enough to pull the engine clear. It was then mounted on a proper engine stand.

On a positive note, the lesson learnt for the rebuild is to use a more substantial trolley which is as low to the ground as possible and to have a backout plan in case something does go wrong. Even with the self-induced problems, I still think dropping the engine is the way to go!

Jul 262012
 

Cooling on the original Series 1 cars was provided by a thin single two bladed cooling fan. This was uprated for the Series 2 with the introduction of twin four bladed fans. One of the popular upgrades is to improve the cooling by installing kits from Kenlowe or Coolcat, which are probably more suited to the stop-starting of today’s congested roads. I’m not sure if this upgrade is more targeted for the S1, so my aim is to restore all three fans, pick the better two for the rebuild and keep the third as a spare. I will then re-evaluate once I’ve driven the car for a period of time.

Motor body prior to shot-blastingThe alloy end plates were sent off to be ultrasonically cleaned while I renovated the motor body and internals. The renovation of the motor bodies ended up being a bit of a palaver and took several goes before I was happy with the end result. They were quite heavily rusted and after shot-blasting revealed quite heavy pitting. Rather optimistically, I thought this would be hidden when they were painted with silver Hammerite. What I soon learnt was that paint is not a good filler as the pitting was still clearly visible through the paint. Also I wasn’t happy with the colour of the silver Hammerite compared with the original finish which was a dark silver grey.All the bodies were quite badly pitted

Unfortunately Hammerite have stopped making the dark silver paint and it took quite a while before I managed to find a suitable equivalent, Rust-oleum paint code 7388.0.4. In the meantime the motor bodies had been shot-blasted again and the pitting filled with Isopon Metalik filler. The first attempt with the Rust-oleum was a disaster. The paint seemed to effervesce on contact, presumably to obtain the hammered effect, but the bubbles created remained in the final finish.

Colour difference between the Hammerite and Rust-oleum ... the wiper motor will now be re-painted to match!I finally managed to get a reasonable result by heating the spray can in hot water and the motor body in a low oven. This reduced the viscosity of the paint sufficiently to allow the bubbles to burst and then the paint to level sufficiently before it started to ‘skin’.

The photo to the left shows the motor body painted with Rust-oleum compared with the wiper motor painted in silver hammerite. I’ll now re-paint the wiper motor body in the darker grey.

The armatures were next to be tackled. The rusted iron parts forming the electromagnet were carefully wire brushed before being polished. Then Gtechniq S1 Smartmetal was applied to give a hydrophobic coating which hopefully might delay the onset of rusting in future. Finally the copper contacts were polished with good old Brasso, the gaps between the contacts cleaned out and new brush sets obtained, Lucas part BR1 743171.

Before …

and after

New brush sets

Armature condition as removed from the fan motor

Armature after cleaning and polishing

New motor brush sets purchased on eBay

The stator and the various bolts, washers and screws where then zinc-nickel plated using a kit purchased from Gateros Plating. The electroplating is surprisingly simple and good results can easily be achieved. The components were finally ready for the rebuild.

The rebuild process is, to use the overused terminology from Haynes manual, the ‘reverse sequence’ of the dismantling … but in this case it is as simple as that!

Plated stator

Armature refitted

Completed fan motor

The fan mounting brackets and the radiator cowl were originally a black, crinkle finish. Suitable crinkle paint spray cans are readily available but, while researching it, I found out that it’s possible to get a powder coating with a crinkle finish. After the disaster with the Rust-oleum hammered paint, I decided to go down the powder coated route.

However, it appears that the crinkle finish look must have fallen out of favour as I’d contacted almost all the local powder coating firms and none of them stocked it. I was about to give up when I found a small firm who had a small supply tucked away. A few days later and the parts were returned. I do hope that, after all this effort, the fans are up to the job!!

When the cars left the factory there were two plastic shields which covered the opening in the rear end plate for the electrical connections but these were missing. Fortunately SNG Barratt now remanufacturer these but I’m not convinced how effective they will be at keeping water out. I guess they’re better than nothing.

Cooling Fan with plastic shroud

Cooling fans – ready to fit

Before shot of the cooling fans

Fans and cowling restored to their former glory. Fingers crossed they're up to the job!

The before shot of the fans and shrouds

Apr 242012
 

As with all the other electrical units, the alloy parts were was ultrasonically cleaned and then sprayed with Gtechniq S1 SmartMetal while the other steel parts were zinc-nickel plated. The next two tasks were to sort out the gearbox lid which had been distorted and also to strip and paint the yoke.

The offending motor gearbox lid after several attempts at heat shrinkingThe centre area of the gearbox lid has been stretched at some point. Therefore its outer perimeter no longer made a continuous seal and so would allow water into the gearbox housing.

The suggested solution was to heat shrink the centre section of the lid to reverse the deformation – heating the centre of the lid to near red heat and then rapidly cooling. After several attempts of heating the lid with a gas blow torch and cooling using a can of compressed CO2, all I succeeded in doing was to work harden it in exactly the same shape as before. Aaaaaaargh!

It probably needs to be heated to a much higher temperature using oxy acetylene. In the end I cheated to avoid holding up the rebuild and obtained a replacement lid. When I get time I’ll give it a proper go at flattening the lid, as I would like to keep the original with the correct stampings.

The wiper motor yoke painted in silver hammerite .... at some point I'll repaint in the correct colourNext up was the yoke which contains the two permanent magnets. The magnets can be removed by lifting the retaining clips so the yoke could then be shot blasted before being painted in silver hammerite. I was quite pleased with the finished article even though the silver hammerite was not quite the correct colour.

During the refurbishing of the cooling fan motors I had found a dark silver hammered paint from Rust-oleum, which is very similar to the orginal colour. At some stage I will re-paint the round bodied yoke but decided to put it off for now. Mainly because of the difficulty I’d had getting a good finish with the Rust-oleum product.

Fortunately the armature wasn’t in such a bad state as those in the cooling fan motors and so all that was required was some light wire brushing and polishing before the S1 SmartMetal coating. I had investigated the availability of new brushes and parking switch units but these seemed to be rather difficult to get hold of. Therefore when I spotted a ‘new, old stock’ brush unit for sale I thought I’d get it as a spare for the future. However I’ve not yet found anyone who can supply the parking switch units.

Cleaned armature Triple Brushes Wiper Motor Parts

The armature was wired brushed to remove the worse of the rust. It was then polished and finally sprayed with Gtechniq S1

The armature brushes and parking switch unit

The wiper motor compentent ready for the rebuild, including the spare armature brushes unit

The rebuild starts with installing the armature brushes and parking switch unit, as these are wired together. The brushes are secured by three small setscrews and the connecting wiring passes through a notch in the motor gearbox housing.

The parking switch is secured by two setscrews from the inside of the gearbox compartment, as shown in the middle photo below. This also shows the protruding parking switch plunger which is activated by a cam on the underside of the gear wheel. The cam positioning is such that it operates the switch when the wiper blades return to their normal rest position.

First fit the brushes Parking switch attachment ACF50 applied to Yoke

The brushes and the parking switch unit are the first to be fitted

The parking switch is attached by two setscrews from inside the gearbox housing. Note the switch plunge which operates when the wipers return to their normal rest position

The interior of the yoke was sprayed with ACF50 which provides a good protection from moisture

After several attempts at fitting the armature and yoke, I found it easier to first fit the armature into the brushes and motor gearbox and then fit the yoke. With this approach its was necessary to hold the armature’s worm drive from within the gearbox so that, when fitting the yoke, the yoke’s magnets didn’t pull the armature out of the brushes. Also don’t do what I did and forget to fit the plain washer between the armature and motor gearbox housing!

Care was also needed in making sure that the thrust and fibre washers were correctly seated in the yoke bearing housing. The easiest way to do this was to join the two with yoke positioned so the ‘bearing’ housing was facing downwards.

Initially I tried to put the armature into the yoke and then attach them both to the motor gearbox. However the problem was it was then difficult to withdraw the three sprung brushes at the same time as inserting the armature, because the yoke restricted access to the brushes.

The middle photo below shows the arrow head marking on the motor gearbox and a corresponding line on the yoke. These need to be aligned when refitting. Also shown is the threaded armature stop. This was then screwed into the gearbox housing until it touched the nylon cap on the armature shaft, before being backed off a 1/4 of a turn.

Next fit the armature Alignment markings Belleville washer goes here

The brushes were then withdrawn to allow the armature to be inserted

The markings on the motor gearbox housing and the yoke must be aligned when re-fitting

The Belleville washer provides pre-load for the armature shaft

The Belleville washers is then positioned within the gearbox before inserting the geared output shaft. The rest of the gearbox was then filled with grease before the output rotatry link and gearbox lid were refitted. The rubber moulding sealing the output shaft area had hardened and split.

At the time I dismantled the motor, it was one of the few parts that wasn’t being remanufactured. Probably because it was only used on the Series 2. However by the time I has started the rebuild, one of the suppliers had made a small batch so I decided to grab one while still available.

Re-packed with grease Output rotary link Motor rebuild completed!

The geared output shaft (just about visible) was inserted and then the remaining space packed with grease

The output rotry link was refitted which also secures the geared output shaft. Although I'd forgotten to insert the rubber seal first .... so I'll have to refit it

The completed wiper motor

The only thing that remains is to adjust the various wiper motor & rack linkages which can only be done once they’re installed in the car. People usually leave the installation of the windscreen until the latter stages of a rebuild. I guess this is because it would restrict access to dash area. However I’m tempted to install the windscreen as soon as the dash wiring looms and dash panels are in place. Therefore I’ll be able to adjust the linkages before the bulkhead access become restricted.

Mar 202012
 

My initial plan for the renovation of the alternator was mainly cosmetic but also to check, and replace where necessary, the slip rings and brushes. Slip ring wear can be determined by removing the brush holder and they had definitely seen better days. They were quite heavily grooved so the renovation soon turned into a full rebuild. At this point I started to research the workings of the Lucas 11AC alternator to help understand what I was taking on. I came across the Rootes website which covers an upgrade of the internals to a more modern design.

The upgrade involves adding an additional three rectifying diodes, the output of which will be used to energise the field coil. The main benefits would be that by changing to be self-energising, the rotor winding wouldn’t be susceptible to burn out in the event of the alternator belt failing, there’s no need for the alternator relay or 3AW ignition light relay and it provides a “softer” start, therefore providing better protection for the other electrical components.

Unfortunately I had destroyed the 3AW relay when the car was dismantled – one of its spade connections was more strongly attached to the female connector on the wiring loom than the relay itself and broke free! I’d also read that some viewed the relay as a weak point in the charging system and prone to failure, although modern solid state units are available.

It made sense to make this upgrade while the alternator was dismantled and would avoid needing to source a new 3AW unit. The upgrade didn’t appear to be too complex and hopefully within my DIY skills!

The diagram is for a positive earth alternator but does reflect the interior component for negative earth models

The main components of the Lucas 11AC alternator are; the alloy drive end bracket, the rotor, the stator laminations & windings, the rectifying diode heatsink and the alloy slip-ring end bracket. The diode heatsink is attached to the rear casing via three insulated threaded studs, which act as the electrical terminals. The stator is clamped between the two end brackets with the rotor passing through the middle.

The dismantling of the alternator proved to be much harder than the other electrical components. This was because the design uses a woodruff key which, despite all efforts, was refusing to come out. The woodruff key is a semi-circular disk that is inserted into a slot in the alternator shaft, leaving a protruding tab. This tab mates with key slots in the belt pulley and cooling fan to prevent them from rotating relative to the shaft. The pulley and fan are held in place by a retaining shaft nut and can be withdrawn, once the nut has been removed, to reveal the key.

A slot in the pulley mates with the protruding woodruff key

With the end nut removed, the pulley and fan can be removed

The woodruff key is then revealed - on the left hand sie of the shaft

The difficulty in removing the key was that it did not protrude enough to enable a drift to get onto the end of the key with a sufficient angle away from the shaft. After many frustrating hours getting nowhere, I decided to do some research on the internet in the hope that I would find useful tips on how to remove them. After many frustrating hours surfing the internet and getting nowhere, except for pearls of wisdom as useful as a chocolate teapot (“then remove the key with pliers”), I left it for several days to have a re-think.

In the meantime the rest of the alternator was dismantled by removing the three clamping bolts holding the unit together. This enabled the alternator to be split in half; the front drive end bracket & rotor and the rear slip ring end bracket with the attached rectifying diode heatsink and stator.

Complete unit prior to dismantling

Rear slip-ring end bracket with the rectifying diode heatsink and stator

View of rectifying diode heatsink which houses the six button diodes

As mentioned, the diode heatsink is attached to the rear casing via three threaded terminal posts. Once the external retaining nuts have been removed from the terminals, the stator and diodes heatsink can be withdrawn. The two are connected by the wires for the three stator windings.

Care was taken to note the various insulating washers and fittings on the terminal posts. Both the B+ and AL posts are insulated from the slip ring end bracket while the third terminal post acts as the negative earth connection. The plastic housing holding the sprung slip ring brushes was removed, followed by pressing out the rotor shaft bearing from the rear casing.

Electrical connections at the rear of the alternator

Removing the plastic housing cover reveals the rotor brushes, which can then be withdrawn

Stator and stator winding, with the diode housing attached

I could put it off no longer – the woodruff key had to be removed. The solution that finally worked was very Heath Robinson, essentially using a vice to press the bottom of the key into the shaft. This caused the key to rotate in the slot resulting in pushing the upper part ever so slightly outwards but enough to get a drift onto it. It still required a reasonable amount of force to drift it out but at least I could now continue.

Now the key had been removed the rotor and front casing could be separated. All that remained was to remove a circlip holding in the front rotor bearing so it could be pressed out. The bearing had almost seized solid and couldn’t be rotated by hand so I was glad I had decided to overhaul the whole unit. The two end casings were then sent away for ultrasonic cleaning while parts were sourced for the upgrade/rebuild.

The commutator was showing signs of wear so it was removed. Replacements are still available

Grooves had started to form in the commutator where the brushes make contact

Finally the front rotor bearing was removed

Feb 232012
 

A rather grubby wiper motorThe wiper motor in the S2 is a Lucas Type 15W motor, the output of which drives a connecting rod to the triple wiper rack. From what I can tell the 15W motor essentially works in the same manner as the DL3 wiper motors used in the earlier cars, except that the parking switch is now internal within the 15W.

There are two main sections of the wiper motor; a round bodied section (which acts as the yoke, completing the magnetic circuit) and the motor gearbox. The round bodied section has two permanent field magnets attached to its inner wall and houses the motor’s armature. At the end of the armature shaft is a worm drive that drives the geared output shaft in the motor gearbox.

Worm drive at the end of the armature shaftThe two long yoke retaining bolts were removed which enabled the round bodied section and armature to be carefully withdrawn until the worm drive is free. Unchecked, the action of the worm drive would pull the armature shaft further into the motor gearbox. A threaded stop screw limits the permitted travel of the armature shaft and there’s also flat thrust washer between the armature and motor gearbox.

The internals were quite badly corroded ... like everything else!The armature can then be withdrawn from the yoke. Although a reasonable amount of force is required to overcome the magnetic attraction between the permanent magnets and the armature.

The interior of the yoke was fairly heavily rusted and all the tiny, loose rust particles were now annoyingly attached to the permanent magnets.

The thrust plate and fibre washer in the 'bearing housing'The end of the armature rotates in, what the manual describes as, a bearing housing in the cap of the yoke. However there isn’t a bearing as such. Only a small thrust plate and fibrous washer. I didn’t realise they were there at the time of dismantling so I was lucky not to lose them.

A cover on the main motor housing provides access to the geared output drive. Sometime in the past this cover had become deformed and so it no longer provided a tight seal around its full perimeter (just about visible in the lower photo to the right).

The main housing cover had been deformed creating a gap which would allow water inThe cover can be pressed back into shape but it immediately pops back, in a similar manner to the lid of an opened jar. I think it’s referred as oil canning and is a result of the centre area of the lid having been stretched.

It should be possible to reverse the stretching by heat shrinking the centre of the plate but that will have to wait until the rebuild.

Removing the cover revealed copious amounts of thick brown grease. I think the grease had dried out long ago and it was surprising the motor was able to turn at all! The rest of the dismantling was very straight forward.

Hardened grease within Worm drive engaged Triple armature brushes

Over time the grease had dried out and hardened. It was surprising the gear could actually turn

Armature worm drive re-engaged for photo. Armature free play is set by tightening a screw, just visible on the left

The

As the wiring between the armature brushes and the parking switch unit is fixed, they had to be removed together. This required the removal of the geared output shaft to gain access to the screws securing the parking switch unit. The output rotary link is removed which enabled the geared output shaft to be withdrawn.

Output rotary link Geared output shaft Parking switch screws

Removal of the output rotary link

Withdrawing the geared output shaft

The removal of the gear wheel provides access to the screws securing the parking switch unit

The geared output shaft has a Belleville washer (conical spring washer) inside the motor gearbox to provide pre-loading and a flat washer between the motor gearbox and the rotary link.

Parking switch wiring Belleville washer Rear rubber seal

The motor has three brushes to provide dual speed operation, which are connected the parking unit

Conical spring washer between the geared output shaft and the motor gearbox

Motor gearbox and the rubber moulding sealing the output shaft had hardened over time

Feb 192012
 

Two new fans for a Series 2 were ordered from SNG Barratt. However when they arrived they were too large to fit in the radiator cowling. The diameter of the supplied fans was approx. 1″ bigger than the originals. They had sent me fans for an XJS V12, which would explain the incorrect part number being moulded in the fan centre! They looked identical apart from the increased diameter.

So I called Barratts to explain and they said they simply trim them to the correct size. I could either send them back for Barratts to resize or do it myself. I couldn’t be bothered with the hassle of sending them back so decided to do it myself.

6mm ply was used to fabricate templates to trim off the excessIt’s a well-known phenomenon that as soon as the dreaded ‘E’ word is mentioned the cost of parts rocket skyward, to whatever the vendor and, being of a cynical nature, the vendor community think they can get away with. The fans being a case in point. At the time, an XJS fan cost £15 while the E-Type fan cost over £30 – an eye-watering mark up! So it’s worth finding out if a part was common to other models/marques.

The plan to trim off the excess from the fans was to sandwich a fan between two plywood templates. Then run a router around the template so the smooth shaft section of the router bit would butt against the template and the cutting section cut through the excess fan blade below.


Birdfeeder base was an exact diameter match which made making the templates much easierAs luck would have it, the base of a garden birdfeeder had exactly the same diameter as the original fan. So this was used to cut out the templates, using the same method above.

It also became clear as work progressed that the plan was rather over-engineered. All that would be required was a correctly shaped upper template for a section a little wider than the fan blade. A blade could be positioned under this section and trimmed with the router.

A router was then used to cut off the protruding fan bladeThe fan could then be rotated until the next blade was under the same section and process repeated until all the blades had been cut to the correct length and profile. The blade ends were then lightly sanded to remove any remaining swarf and were then ready for fitting.

Feb 182012
 

Unscrewing the two long bolts provides access to the internal componentsOne of the great things I’ve found about the restoration of the various electrical components is that they were designed in an era before our ‘throw away’ society. Therefore overhauling the units is well within the capability of most enthusiasts. As with the fuel pump, the stripping down of the fan motors was very simple.

Having said that, the fans had been attached the wrong way round and no matter what I tried they would not come free. I tried using a small, hub puller type tool on the first fan. However all this achieved was to shear the nylon fan from its central metal fixing, which then had to be carefully cut off using a Dremel tool. So two new fans were added to the ever growing shopping list of parts required!

The fan motor casing consists of a square steel body clamped between two alloy end plates. After the two long screws have been withdrawn, the end plates can be prised from the body with a screw driver. These Lucas motors weren’t designed to be watertight as the rear end plates have openings for the electrical connections. So, over time, water ingress had taken its toll on the interior components.

Rear end plate

Corrosion within!

A rusted armature

A little persuasion was all that was needed to remove the end plate

The internals were fairly rusty ... probably not helped by the openings for the electrical connections in the end plate allowing water in

The armature had suffered worst

As the fan was still attached, the rotor (or armature), the front end plate and fan had to be removed as one. The only other parts within the motor are a wound stator and the armature brushes mounted in a plastic holder. The holder can be withdrawn by removing the two screws on the underside of the motor body.

Wound stator removal

Wound stator & brushes

Stator is just a push fit

Two central screws secure the stator housing

Stator housing can then be removed

The stator removed from the plastic housing

The stator can then be pushed out of the plastic holder. The brushes are loose fitting and can simply be pulled apart and lifted away from the holder. In the end neither fan blade could be removed intact. A Dremel with a cutting disc was needed to remove the metal fixing that remained stubbornly attached to the armature shaft. Once it had been removed the armature and front end plate could be separated.

A thrust washer sits between the front end plate and the armature. A similar washer isn’t necessary between the armature and the rear end plate. When the fan is operating, the fan blade produces a forward force on the armature pushing it towards the front end plate and away from the rear end plate. Therefore there is no load on against the rear end plate.

Thrust washer between the front end plate and the armature

Feb 032012
 

The pump body and most of the other alloy parts were taken to Carb Clean to be ultrasonically cleaned. I thought this would be better than blasting with a lightly abrasive medium and was pleased with how the parts came out.

It became apparent that one of the common problems with this SU pump was the tendency for the points to stick, especially on cars stored over winter. After hearing stories of drivers having to use a hammer to whack the pump back into life, I decided it was probably a good idea to upgrade from points to electronic actuation with a kit supplied by Burlen Fuels.

A fuel pump repair kit was also ordered which contains all the various gaskets, non-return valves, diaphragms etc for a full rebuild. Whilst this was not exactly a cost effective choice, with the cost of the parts close to that of a new pump, it was done more out of interest to understand the inner workings of the pump. Most of the parts for the rebuild kit are shown in the picture along with the cleaned pump body and non-return valve clamping plate.

The rebuild of the pump body section was simply the reverse of the steps taken to strip the pump down. The only issue was the orientation of the domed diaphragm in the delivery chamber. I’d taken plenty of photos when dismantling the pump but none of them showed clearly whether the dome should face into the delivery chamber or the cover. The service manual suggested that it should face into the delivery chamber but the diagram also had additional springs and diaphragm plates which were not present on my pump. A quick call to the technical department at Burlen Fuels confirmed that this was the case.

Delivery Chamber Inlet Chamber Pumping Chamber

Stating the obvious but the only issue with the installation of the non-return values is to ensure their correct orientation. This can be checked by blowing backward and forwards through the value to determine from which side flow is possible. The only other difference between the two valve assemblies is the presence of a gauze filter on the inlet side.

The new armature guides supplied in the repair kit were 5 plastic figures of 8, as shown in the first photo above. The original guide was a single piece and the new guides seemed to be a backwards step rather than an improvement. So the original part was refitted and avoided having to hold five guides in place when refitting the armature/diaphragm into the coil housing.

Next the return spring is placed with the smaller circumference towards the armature. The pump body, armature/diaphragm and coil housing can then be reassembled and secured by 6 screws.

Converting the pump to electronic actuation requires a magnet carrier to be attached to the upper end of the armature spindle. First a plastic guide tube is pushed over the spindle down into the coil housing. This centralises the spindle movement within the coil housing. The magnet carrier is fully screwed onto the spindle before being backed off until it is aligned to be perpendicular to the line passing through the pedestal mounting holes. It is then secured in this position on the spindle by tightening an allen screw.

The bakelite pedestal is replace by a PCB which is mounted on spacers to raise it away from the coil housing. On one of the spacer mountings contains a ‘Hall Effect’ fork. The fork enables the electronic circuit to detect the travel of the magnet carrier and thereby control the energising of the coil.

The fuel pump operation can be ‘tuned’ by the rotational positioning of the Hall Effect fork. This is achieved by loosening the screw above the fork and slowly rotating the fork until the pump speed reaches its maximum. The fine tuning would wait until the final testing of the pump when flow rates would be checked.

Feb 022012
 

Series 3 fan motor?At some stage one of the cooling fan motors had been replaced with a round-bodied motor which I think must be from a Series 3, shown on the right. So the first task was to acquire a second motor which is correct for the Series 2. One of the vendors at the Jaguar International Spares day suggested that these occasionally came up on the eBay website.

I’d vaguely heard of eBay at the time and thought it was mainly used by people peddling tat and dodgy items. However needs must, so I logged on and started monitoring new Jaguar/E-Type ‘listings’. It took a while to get used to the ins and outs of their auction process. I’d soon lost count of the number of times I’d placed a bid days before the auction ended, only to find all the bidding happened within the last few seconds. I didn’t have time for that!

I must admit that subsequently I’ve been surprised how useful eBay has been, although I still think there’s a lot of tat on there – so buyer beware! Someone from the E-Type forum pointed me to an ‘auction sniper’ website which automatically makes bids for you, seconds before the auction ends, and so takes all the hassle away. Sure enough, someone listed two square bodied motors for sale but in need of complete overhaul.

Buckled boot lid frameOddly, at the end of their advert, they mentioned they were looking to get hold of a boot lid. At some point my car had had a slight shunt at the rear which had twisted the frame under the boot lid’s skin, which is just about visible in the photo. The bodyshop suggested that, although it could be repaired, it would probably cost as much as a new one as the skin would have to be removed to repair the frame.

As luck would have it, I had already sourced a replacement and so had the other one spare. I mentioned its condition to the eBay seller and that it might not be economical to repair but they seemed keen on cutting a deal – so a straight swap was agreed, with the transaction taking place late at night in a layby just outside of Brockenhurst!

Sourced motors with fan mounted back-to-front!The motors were indeed in need of a complete overhaul and for some reason had the white fans mounted back to front. I’m sure this wouldn’t have helped in the efficiency of the cooling and it certainly didn’t help when I came to remove them! Funnily enough, a few days later, an advert appeared on eBay for a basket case restoration of a red roadster, with my blue boot lid! As I said – buyer beware.

Jan 312012
 

The hardest part of the process was actually the removal the fuel pump! It’s located in the boot space above the offside wheel arch. The pump is attached to the body via three rubber mountings to an L-shaped bracket bolted to the pump body and a circular bracket clamped around the pump’s coil housing.

Each rubber mounting is comprised of two threaded studs joined by a rubber section, which reduces the transmission of vibrations to the chassis when the pump is running. The problem was that, even with a period of soaking with penetrating oil, any rotation of a nut would simply be taken up by the rubber section deforming and not undoing the nut from the stud. Finally, after much cursing, I gave up and resorted to a bolt splitter.

Once removed from the car, the dismantling of the pump is a fairly straight forward process. I started by removing the six screws around the base of the coil housing which allowed the pump body and coil housing to be separated, revealing the diaphragm and pumping chamber.

The inlet and outlet value assemblies are retained under a clamping plate secured by two screws, as shown in the photo. Once the clamping plate was withdrawn, the valve assemblies, inlet gauze filter and gaskets could be removed. The valves had to be prized out which resulted in their destruction however they were to be replaced as a matter of course.

The dismantling of the pump body section was completed by removing the inlet and delivery chamber covers. The inlet cover is simply a cork gasket and cover retained by a central bolt and washer. As far as I can tell the inlet chamber smooths the flow of fuel by having an air pocket which can expand or contract according to the pressure in the chamber. Four screws retain the delivery chamber cover under which is an ‘O’ ring, diaphragm and plastic gasket, see photo. Again the chamber provides smoothing of the flow of fuel due to the flexing of the diaphragm.

The disassembly of the coil housing section was also a simple process. The black plastic end cover was withdrawn once the terminal nut had been undone and the tape sealing the end cover/coil housing join removed. Underneath the cover is the contact point assembly, which consists of a Bakelite pedestal holding the sprung upper contact points and a rocker mechanism holding the lower contact points. A small capacitor is connected between the upper and lower contacts to suppress arching across the points gap as arching causes premature deterioration of the contact points.

After the two screws had been removed the pedestal could be rotated away from the rocker mechanism. Both the upper and lower contact points were badly corroded. Finally the rocker mechanism and armature & spindle were removed. This can be achieved by disconnecting the leads to the rocker mechanism and then rotating it until free from the spindle. Alternatively the armature/diaphragm can be rotated anticlockwise until the spindle is free of the rocker mechanism.

When the pump was first removed what appears to be a capacitor (see the photo on the left) was connected across the positive terminal and earth. This part doesn’t appear on the Jaguar parts list so I assume this must have been added at a later stage. As previously mentioned capacitors were used to suppress electrical arching but I’m not sure whether this capacitor was added for this reason or possibly to suppress electrical interference produced when the pump is in operation.

 Posted by at 7:06 pm